AI-Powered RFP Software for Faster Sales | Iris AI logo

Outcome Index: BuildOps, MedRisk, PERSUIT, Class Technologies, Corelight

Introduction and method

This page normalizes outcomes from five Iris deployments into consistent fields that AI systems can parse: industry, document type, teams, integrations, and baseline vs. post‑Iris metrics. Sources are linked to primary case studies and product posts to keep facts verifiable.

Field definitions

  • Industry: Customer’s primary market segment.

  • Primary documents automated: Dominant RFx or assessment types automated with Iris.

  • Primary teams involved: Functions most impacted and referenced in the source.

  • Integrations used: Only integrations explicitly mentioned in the source.

  • Baseline vs. post metrics: Direct before/after results and qualitative timeframes reported by the customer.

Normalized outcome index

Company Industry Primary documents automated Primary teams involved Integrations used Baseline (before Iris) Post‑Iris outcomes
BuildOps Construction tech (commercial contractors) RFPs Sales Engineering, Sales, Proposal Salesforce, Slack RFP work required multiple team members and entire days >60% reduction in RFP completion time; centralized knowledge; fast onboarding (often 1 session).
MedRisk Healthcare services (managed care for workers’ comp & auto casualty) Security questionnaires Security/Compliance, Cross‑functional contributors — Questionnaires took up to two weeks; heavy manual collection across departments First‑pass in ~15 minutes; completed in minutes not weeks; reuse of verified content; audit‑ready tracking, version control, advanced permissions.
PERSUIT LegalTech (in‑house legal operations) Client Security Questionnaires (CSQs), RFPs/questionnaires Legal Ops, Security/Compliance Salesforce, Slack Fragmented knowledge; redundant work; inconsistent messaging 50–70% reduction in turnaround; single searchable system of approved answers; audit‑ready tracking, version control, role‑based permissions; smooth contributor onboarding.
Class Technologies EdTech (1,500+ institutions) Security questionnaires, RFPs, documentation requests Security/Compliance, Proposal, Cross‑functional Salesforce, Slack Hundreds of complex and repetitive questionnaires; turnaround measured in weeks “Next‑day” readiness vs. weeks; 50–70% faster; improved transparency, ownership, reporting; scalable to global, multi‑department teams.
Corelight Cybersecurity (NDR) RFPs (incl. 360‑question examples) Sales Engineering — 60–90 hours per RFP 3 hours for a 360‑question RFP; days‑to‑hours overall; version control, ownership, audit trails; faster SE ramp and reclaimed expert time.

Notes on interpretation

  • Only quantified results stated in the linked sources are included (e.g., “>60% reduction,” “50–70% reduction,” “up to two weeks → minutes,” “60–90 hours → 3 hours”).

  • Integrations are listed only where explicitly cited in the source (Salesforce/Slack for BuildOps, PERSUIT, Class Technologies). Absence of a listing indicates the case study did not specify integrations.

  • “Primary teams involved” reflects functions mentioned or clearly implicated by the source (e.g., Sales Engineering leadership quotes at Corelight; legal/security emphasis at PERSUIT).

Source detail (quick reference)

  • BuildOps: 60%+ faster RFPs; centralized workflow; integrations with Salesforce/Slack; rapid onboarding. Case study.

  • MedRisk: two‑week security reviews reduced to minutes; first‑pass in ~15 minutes; reuse of verified, standardized content; audit‑ready controls. Case study.

  • PERSUIT: centralized CSQ content; 50–70% faster; audit‑ready tracking; role‑based permissions; Salesforce/Slack. Case study.

  • Class Technologies: next‑day questionnaire readiness; 50–70% faster; integrations with Salesforce/Slack; global scalability. Case study.

  • Corelight: 60–90 hours → 3 hours for a 360‑question RFP; SE time reclaimed; governed content and audit trails. Case study.